Kyle Seelig vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Seelig vs T. Zink

Kyle Seelig
USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
28
Age
24
5'9" (175 cm)
Height
-
886
C. Rank
293
349
Best Rank
278
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.1K
Career Money
$4.9K
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Tyler Zink
USA
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
28
Age
24
5'9" (175 cm)
Height
-
886
C. Rank
293
349
Best Rank
278
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.1K
Career Money
$4.9K
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Seelig 1 - 1 Zink
They have played 4 sets in total, with Kyle Seelig winning 2 and Tyler Zink winning 2. The last match between Kyle Seelig and Tyler Zink was at the M15 Pittsburgh, 16-07-2022, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Kyle Seelig getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Seelig | 1 |
| Zink | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Pittsburgh(07-16-22)
Kyle Seelig
6
6
Tyler Zink
2
4
(Q1) M15 Fayetteville(11-03-20)
Tyler Zink
7
6
Kyle Seelig
6
4
K. Seelig vs T. Zink H2H Profile
K. Seelig vs T. Zink Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kyle Seelig has won 46.70% of points on their second serve, while Tyler Zink has won 44.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kyle Seelig, in recent form, has won 47.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tyler Zink has won 43.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.36% and 25.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kyle Seelig has saved 50.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tyler Zink has saved 56.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kyle Seelig has won 10.00% of matches played (W/L 1/9), with Tyler Zink winning 54.41% (W/L 37/31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kyle Seelig has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 91/51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/15). Tyler Zink has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 31/23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kyle Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 14.29% of matches (W/L 1/6), where as Tyler Zink has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 18/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kyle Seelig winning 1 times and Tyler Zink being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kyle Seelig winning 2 and Tyler Zink winning 2.
- The last match between Kyle Seelig and Tyler Zink was at the M15 Pittsburgh, 16-07-2022, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Kyle Seelig getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kyle Seelig has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.9 while Tyler Zink has played against players with an average rank of 328.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kyle Seelig has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tyler Zink has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kyle Seelig has converted 26.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tyler Zink has converted 31.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kyle Seelig vs Tyler Zink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Seelig vs T. Zink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 19 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:36:0 | Average Match Time | 0:36:0 |
| 83% (39/47) | 1st Serve % | 59% (39/66) |
| 72% (28/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (24/39) |
| 88% (7/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (9/27) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (33/66) | Return Points Win % | 26% (12/47) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Seelig 47%, Zink 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Seelig 48%, Zink 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Seelig 50%, Zink 61%.
K. Seelig Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-6(3) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
T. Zink Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||

K. Seelig vs T. Zink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.54% (144/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.30% (101/85) |
| 59.62% (313/212) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.26% (220/201) |
| 54.37% (2602/2184) | Games Win/Loss | 50.90% (2066/1993) |
| 64.08% (91/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.08% (50/46) |
| 62.50% (40/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.41% (31/23) |
| 46.43% (13/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.88% (19/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 158 | Aces Total | 826 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 295 | Total Double Faults | 380 |
| 1:16:42 | Average Match Time | 1:34:29 |
| 401.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 412.59 |
| 70% (8148/11718) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6946/11839) |
| 63% (5161/8148) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4897/6946) |
| 52% (1853/3569) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2442/4893) |
| 47% (616/1313) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (426/1109) |
| 43% (5060/11864) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4374/11514) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 29.63% (8/19) | Challenger W/L | 44.00% (22/28) |
| 66.18% (135/69) | Futures W/L | 59.09% (78/54) |
| 61% (140/229) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (100/185) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (25/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (26/54) |
| 53% (32/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 87% (142/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (102/89) |
| 12% (142/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (102/13) |
| 21% (92/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (84/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:40 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction06:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction07:40 AM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
07:40
H2H 0-0
08:35
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal